Did you think you were done reading my Twi-rants? Well . . . sort of. Actually, I'm not entirely sure what today's rant is about - just that something needs to be ranted.
Have you heard of 50 Shades of Grey? It *might* be the most terrible book ever written. Seriously. It is never-supposed-to-be-published-and-see-the-light-of-day bad. And it wasn't - supposed to see the light of day, I mean. Other than the deepest, darkest bowels of the internet.
For the lucky uninitiated, 50 Shades started out as Twilight fanfiction by someone who was bitter bout the lack of explicit sex scenes in the originals. So they wrote all the varying levels of dirty things they wished Bella and Edward had in the first place and put it online. And you know that episode of Friends where Joey writes a letter of recommendation to the adoption agency for Chandler and Monica? In places it reads more or less like that. I haven't read it myself, but I have been made aware of a website that posts small excerpts that demonstrate just how unreadable this thing is. Where Twilight could have been vastly improved by a couple more rounds with an editor, its knock-off needed a complete tear-down-and-just-start-over treatment. I would include quotes, but honestly the most unreadable bits are also the most not-appropriate-to-put-on-a-blog-my-grandparents-read. Of course, they're also the most thesaurus-ed to death . . . some to the point that you can't even tell what's going on until you run it through a thesaurus yourself to translate it back into what it originally said. And somehow it got so popular in those deep, dark internet bowels that the powers that really shouldn't be anymore decided it should be published. As is. So they ran it through a computer program that changed all instances of "Edward" and "Bella" to . . . I don't know, whatever the names are in the published version. And then sent it directly off to the publisher. And somehow it became the biggest thing among middle-aged women since . . . well, Twilight.
Which brings me to the source of my rant - which might actually be more of a "can someone make it stop being crazy????" sort of plea.
As of a few days ago, 50 Shades of Grey was the most requested title at the library in this town. The mind, she is boggled. If you had asked me before I saw the list on the library website I would have been willing to bet big money that our library didn't even have a copy. Much less four. Much less that if I were to put it on hold today I would be looking at a three month wait to get it. And then 3 more months a piece for each sequel. Because oh yes, there's more of them.
The thing I can't wrap my head around though - who's reading it here? It's widely known to be erotic vampire fiction with extreme BDSM content. It even mentions the erotic part on the library website, which I guess I always figured was more or less a kiss of death for a book in Utah. It's just not the sort of thing you envision sitting on everyone's coffee table around here . . . which, I suppose, is why everyone has it on hold at the library. They all want to read it, but you can bet there won't be cheers and claps when the movie release is included in the important weekly events announcements in Relief Society (actually happened with Twilight in the single's ward in Florida). It's hard to believe such a book could possibly be popular in a place like this, but I have to admit it's a little amusing to wonder which of these apparently perfectly content, perfectly put together, lovely ladies I see everywhere I go are secretly reading the most popular porn since the Kama Sutra (which, as I've been told, isn't actually porn, but I haven't read it. I've only eaten the ice cream, lol). Like I said, I can't wrap my head around it - it's a such a contradictory thought!
I mean, I really can't blame them for getting sucked into a book or series - there are three book releases I'm currently counting down to - but I have to wonder why anyone would choose one so poorly written. Maybe I'm just a book snob. (who are we kidding, I am a book snob.) And I can't help but think of this. 2:29? Sums it all up. But that, like, doesn't happen in Utah. You know? It's not a lecture you hear repeated every six months at the girl broadcasts before conference, just the priesthood session.
In conclusion . . . I am not living in the town I thought I was. And it's a little weird.
P. ost S. cript
Totally counting down to the Olympics next month. Also - totally trying to pretend this wasn't almost 20 years ago. Things I remember - quite clearly - are not allowed to have happened that long ago.